Public Consultation on the Investigation of the Application of Anti-circumvention Measures Against a Cane Sugar Products

The Ministry of Industry and Trade hold a public consultation session on the investigation of the application of anti-circumvention measures against a number of cane sugar products (Case No.AC02. AD13-AS01) on March 09th, 2022 (Hanoi time), in the online platform.

 

On September 21^st, 2021, the Ministry of Industry and Trade issued the Decision No.2171/QD-BCT on the investigation of the application of anti-circumvention measures against a number of cane sugar products.

According to the regulation on Law on Foreign trade management, the related parties of the investigated case may send the investigating authority the information and opinions related to the cases in writing. The inspecting authority shall give an opportunity to interested parties for the consultation in case of the written request. Before the final determination of investigation is disclosed, the investigating authority can organize the public consultation in manner that interested parties can present information and opinions related to the case.

The related parties could register to take part in the public consultation and send the questions for the consultation before 17:00 on March 07^th, 2022 (Hanoi time).

If Client needs any more information or request for legal advice or potential dispute regarding trade remedies measures including, anti-dumping, countervailing duty and safeguard measures or international trade dispute matters, our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers in Vietnam of International trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow up anti-dumping cases and its development to update clients on regular basis.

 

Read More

Dispute settlement method for employee when separating enterprises in Vietnam

In Vietnam, reorganization of an enterprise means the division, separation, consolidation, merger or transformation of an enterprise. In particular, when separating enterprises, in addition to legal issues related to enterprise separation procedures, registration for newly formed enterprises, the introduction of a plan for the employees of the separated company is also a matter of concern. The transferor company and the transferee company need to allocate and use the existing labor force accordingly. It is important to ensure the interests of workers. Specifically, in case of continuing to employ employees, when separating an enterprise, the next employer is responsible for continuing to use up the existing workforce and proceeding with the labor contract amendment and supplement. All of this might lead to potential disputes which lawyers would be involved to provide legal advice from the early stage.

 

Dispute settlement method for employee when separating enterprises in Vietnam

If the enterprise does not use up all the employees or the labor demand of the company does not run out of the existing number of employees, the enterprise must develop a suitable plan to use employees in accordance with the law. Specifically, an employment plan must contain the following main contents: The list and the number of employees to be continued to be used, the employee sent for retraining to continue using; List and number of employees to retire; The list and number of employees who are transferred to part-time work; the employee must terminate the labor contract; Measures and financial resources to ensure implementation of the plan. Enterprises should note that when developing plans for the employment of employees, there must be the participation of organizations representing labor collectives at the grassroots level.

In case it is imperative that the employees quit their job, the enterprise must pay the employee a job loss allowance so that the interests of the employee will still be guaranteed when separating the enterprise. The Labor Code has specified as follows: An employer shall pay a job-loss allowance to an employee who loses his/her job and has worked regularly for the employer for 12 months or longer. The job-loss allowance is equal to 1 month’s wage for each working year, but must not be lower than 2 months’ wage. The working period used for the calculation of job-loss allowance is the total time during which the employee actually works for the employer minus the time during which the employee benefits from unemployment insurance in accordance with the Law of Social Insurance and the working period for which the employer has paid a severance allowance to the employee. The wage used for the calculation of job-loss allowance is the average wage in accordance with the labor contract during 6 months preceding the time the employee loses his/her job.

It is important to have proper and proactive discussion with impacted employee and avoid disputes impacting the company’s reputation. Dispute lawyers in Vietnam could be of help for advice and preparation.

ANT Lawyers is a Labour Dispute Law Firm in Vietnam, recognized by Legal500, IFLR1000. We are an exclusive Vietnam member of Prea Legal, the global law firm network covering more than 150 jurisdictions. The firm provides a range of legal services to multinational and domestic clients.

 

Read More

Extend Deadline for Final Review for the Application of Anti-dumping Measures on Galvanized Steel Products from the Korea and China

The Ministry of Industry and Trade extend deadline for final review for the application of anti-dumping measures on some products galvanized steel products originating from the Republic of Korea and the People’s Republic of China (case No. ER01.AD02).

 

International trade dispute law firm in Vietnam

 On June 04^th, 2021, the Ministry of Industry and Trade issued the Decision No.1524/QD-BCT on the final review of the application of anti-dumping measures to a number of galvanized steel products originating from the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Korea (Case: ER01.AD02).

According to the regulation in Article 82.2 Law on Foreign trade management, the time limit for the final review is 09 months from the day on which the decision on review is issued (on March 04^th, 2022), with a possible extension up to 03 months if necessary.

On February 22^nd, 2022, the Ministry of Industry and Trade issued the Decision No.225/QD-BCT on extending the deadline for period-end review of the application of anti-dumping measures to a number of galvanized steel products originating from the Republic of Korea and the People’s Republic of China for another 03 months. Therefore, the deadline for the reviewing on June 04^th, 2022.

If Client needs any more information or request for legal advice or potential dispute regarding trade remedies measures including, anti-dumping, countervailing duty and safeguard measures or international trade dispute matters, our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers in Vietnam of International trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow up anti-dumping cases and its development to update clients on regular basis

 

Read More

What Are Challenges in Debt Recovery Litigation Procedures for Enterprise

In the operation of the enterprises, the arising of bad debts could be unavoidable. However, in order to be able to file lawsuit and collect debts and minimize bad debts in practice, there are still many difficulties. Currently, the process of debt recovery according to the provisions of the law still encounter many problems and shortcomings, while enterprises need more effective solutions to recover debts fully and quickly in order to ensure revenue and financial balance for enterprise.

 

In order to be able to recover debts according to the provisions of the law, enterprises could hire dispute lawyers or by themselves must go through two stages with relatively complicated procedures. Accordingly, the lawsuit need to be filed and after the court’s judgment, the enterprise needs to file a petition for civil judgment enforcement. Because, the trial stage and the judgment execution phase are two independent stages, each with a different process.

First, the stage of lawsuits in court. When the enterprise’s interests are infringed, the enterprise will need to file a lawsuit at a competent court. This is a traditional method of lawsuits that forces enterprise to comply with the court’s strict processes and procedures and relevant legal regulations.

Specifically, in order to initiate a lawsuit at the court, an enterprise must meet the following conditions to initiate a lawsuit: (i) there is a debt incurred and the debtor fails to pay the debt as committed, leading to a dispute and the enterprise believes that rights and interests are infringed; (ii) the dispute between the enterprise and the debtor in this case must fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the court, not under the jurisdiction of any other agency or organization (arbitration); (iii) in some cases, if there is an agreement or is required by law to carry out pre-litigation procedures such as conciliation, negotiation, notification, etc., the enterprise must complete such procedures before requesting a competent court to settle disputes between the enterprise and the debtor. In addition, in the petition, the enterprise needs to enclose invoices, vouchers and loan documents to prove that the debt collection is grounded. These are the basic conditions that enterprise need to keep in mind when filing a lawsuit to ensure that the petition is valid and not returned.

After the petition is accepted and the enterprise completes the payment of the court fee advance, the court will conduct verification and collect evidences; conducting meetings, checking the handover, accessing and disclosing evidences and conciliation. In case the involved parties cannot reconcile with each other on the payment plan or agree on interest and debt, the court will bring the case to trial. During this period, enterprises need to consider late payment interest, principal and debtor’s financial situation in order for request to be accepted by the court and serve as a basis for possible judgment enforcement.

Second, the procedure for requesting judgment enforcement. After the judgment or decision of the court takes legal effect, it must be respected by organizations and all citizens. Accordingly, enterprises, especially debtors, within the scope of their responsibilities, should strictly abide by judgments and decisions and must take responsibility before law for judgment enforcement. Within 5 years from the date the judgment or decision takes legal effect, the creditor can by himself or authorize another person or dispute law firm to make a written request for judgment enforcement and send it to the district-level judgment enforcement agency where the court is located for first-instance trial court to request judgment enforcement. Accordingly, enterprises need to prepare a written request for judgment enforcement together with the judgment or decision requested for enforcement and other relevant documents. For the extent of the petition for judgment enforcement, the enterprise needs to show information about the debtor’s assets or judgment enforcement conditions.

In addition, enterprises have the right to request civil judgment enforcement agencies to apply measures to secure judgment enforcement, including: freezing of accounts, temporary seizure of assets and papers, temporary suspension of registration, transfer, etc. change the current state of assets to avoid the debtor’s dispersal of assets and inability to repay the debt according to the judgment. At the same time, the judgment enforcement agency will issue a notice of judgment enforcement, setting a time limit for the debtor to voluntarily execute the judgment of 15 days from the date the debtor receives or is duly notified execution decision. At the end of the above-mentioned voluntary time limit, the debtor who has conditions for judgment enforcement but does not voluntarily execute the judgment will be subject to coercion.

The enforcement of money assets will be applied by the judgment enforcement agency one of the measures such as deducting money from the account; subtract from the judgment debtor’s income, collect money from the judgment debtor’s enterprise activities; collect money from judgment debtors who are holding or collect money from judgment debtors who are kept by third parties or sell assets of judgment debtors to collect debts.

Although the judgments and decisions have taken effect, the initiation of lawsuits and judgment enforcement in many cases still cannot be enforced and the enterprise can debt recovery is challenging.

One is the determination of the debtor’s address for the court to serve the documents. The debtor always tends to evade and not cooperate, i.e. constantly changing addresses and causing difficulties for the court in the process of settling the case. Accordingly, the court could not proceed to serve the debtor, then some courts have decided to return the petition to the claimant, or suspend the case because it considers that there are not enough conditions to initiate a lawsuit or not summon the defendant. This is one of the main factors causing delays in the legal process when enterprises initiate lawsuits.

The second is the application of trial procedure in absentia. In order to fully meet the conditions for trial in absentia, the court will take time and many measures to verify and post procedural documents according to regulations. Besides, for debt disputes with complicated elements, it takes more time to collect more documents and evidences, conduct solicitation of document expertise, etc. or the case has many people with interests and obligations related, the trial was adjourned several times. Therefore, the intangible interests of enterprises have been seriously affected.

Third is the execution process. In fact, many enterprises have had court judgments, but the judgment enforcement process has lasted for many years, and enterprise have not been able to recover their debts. This problem may arise from the lack of flexibility in the coordination between banks, other agencies and organizations and the judgment enforcement agency, which is detrimental to the verification and distraint of assets of the agency, directly affecting the time of judgment enforcement.

Fourth is for the distraint, auction of assets that are assets that are difficult to determine the value of, or properties that are in dispute or there are no auction participants are also reasons for the delay in debt recovery.

Fifth is due to human subjective factors. Specifically, due to opposing and uncooperative acts of changing the current status of mortgaged assets, obstructing the verification of judgment enforcement conditions, asset valuation, and asset auction. For movable property, the debtor could actively move or disperse in order to cause difficulties in the handling process. In addition, there are cases where enforcers violate the time limit for notifying or serving judgment enforcement decisions/notices, failing to conduct verification…

Hence, enterprises that wish to proceed debt recovery effectively need to proactively collect information, judgment execution conditions of the debtor and provide it to the judgment enforcement agency. Besides, it is necessary to seek the legal advice of law firm in Vietnam with experience in litigation and enforcement for debt recovery process in Vietnam.

 

Read More

Implementation of the UKVFTA Agreement

On May 1st, 2021, the Free Trade Agreement between Vietnam and the United Kingdom (UKVFTA) officially came into effect, marking an important symbolic step in the growing partnership between Vietnam and UK, facilitating the trade between the two countries, hence making more UK investors choose Vietnam as a destination to make investment, and set up company for operation to enjoy the benefits of the agreement.

 

Law Firm in Vietnam

The UKVFTA has provided regulations governing bilateral trade between the two countries with a value of up to 5.1 billion pound, which is a foundation for trade and investment development, creating a strong framework for UK and Vietnamese businesses.

In addition, the Agreement also provides market access commitments with a schedule to reduce preferential tariffs for import and export goods between the UK and Vietnam. Specifically, the commitment to eliminate 65% of tariff lines in the framework of bilateral trade continues to be maintained in this Agreement. In the next 6 years, 99% of tariff lines will continue to be eliminated tariffs, facilitating import and export for machinery, mechanical equipment, and pharmaceuticals.

In addition, Vietnam has also made commitments higher than Vietnam’s commitments in the WTO to create favorable conditions for UK investors to access Vietnam’s markets, including finance, telecommunications and education. This will help the UK investors to easily access the market and make investments and set up company in Vietnam.

In the field of intellectual property, the parties continue to commit to a high level of protection. The iconic UK products, including Scotch whiskey, Scottish farmed Salmon, Irish whiskey and Irish cream, as well as 36 Vietnamese agricultural products, including Moc Chau tea, Buon Ma Thuot coffee, Hai Hau rice and Phu Quoc fish sauce continue to be protected.

The official entry into force of the UKVFTA is the latest milestone in a year of strengthening bilateral and commercial relations between the UK and Vietnam. The implementation of the UKVFTA Agreement will help investors and enterprises of the two countries easily make investments, ensure the best benefits from the agreement, thereby bringing long-term economic benefits to investment and business.

ANT Lawyers – A Law Firm in Vietnam with international standard, local expertise and strong international network. We focus on customers’ needs and provide clients with a high quality legal advice and services. For advice or services request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529.

 

Read More

Regulations on foreigners owning real estate in Vietnam

How Foreigners Could Buy Real Estate in Vietnam?

Regulations on foreigners owning real estate in Vietnam are regulated in Civil Code 2015, Law on Land 2013, Law on Housing 2014, Decree no. 99/2015/ND- CP on guidelines the Law on Housing and related documents.

 

Real estate dispute lawyers in Vietnam

For land, foreign individuals are not eligible to use land assigned or leased by the State, recognized land use rights, received transfer of land use rights. However, a foreign-invested enterprise could be allocated or leased land by the State, recognized land use rights, or received a land use right transfer. Foreign-invested enterprises that are assigned land by the State with the collection of land use levies to execute investment projects on the construction of houses for sale or for sale in combination with lease.

For housing, foreign entities eligible for the homeownership in Vietnam include: foreign entities who invest in project-based housing construction in Vietnam as prescribed in this Law and corresponding regulations of law; foreign-invested enterprises, branches, representative offices of foreign enterprises, foreign-invested funds and branches of foreign banks operating in Vietnam (hereinafter referred to as foreign organization); foreign individuals who are allowed to enter Vietnam.

The foreign entities are eligible for the homeownership in Vietnam if they invest in project-based housing construction in Vietnam as prescribed in this Law and corresponding regulations of law; or buy, rent and purchase, receive, or inherit commercial housing including apartments and separate houses in the project for housing construction, except for areas under management relating to national defense and security as prescribed in regulations of the Government.

Foreign organizations and individuals must have documents proving being the eligible subjects and meeting conditions to own houses in Vietnam. A foreign individual must have an unexpired passport bearing the entry seal of the Vietnam’s immigration authority and not given diplomatic immunity and privileges according to Ordinance on diplomatic immunity and privileges of diplomatic missions, consular offices, and representative authorities of international organizations in Vietnam. Foreign organizations must be subjects of owning houses in Vietnam which have investment registration certificate or a permission issued by a Vietnam’s competent authority for operation in Vietnam which is still unexpired at the time of housing transaction (hereinafter referred to as investment registration certificate).

A foreign entity shall not be granted a Certificate of the house and may only sell or offer it to another entity eligible to own housing in Vietnam in the case being: a foreign organization or individual receives a house as an inheritance or a gift which is located in an area in which foreign entities must not own houses, or the quantity of which exceeds the permissible limits; a foreign organization that does not operate in Vietnam, or a foreign individual who is not permitted to enter Vietnam, receives a house in Vietnam as a gift or an inheritance.

For specific situations, to avoid future dispute in house ownership arisen from the purchase, lease of property, house, land from the state, developer or other seller, or lessor it is important that the client check with property lawyers for eligibility, conditions and other relevant matters.

ANT Lawyers – Law firm in Vietnam that could assist in different land and house related projects and matters such as land ownership, house purchase or sale and is aware of the differences between provisions on house law for foreigners and Vietnamese. Our professionals could advise clients about possibilities and potential risks concerning real estate laws, housing laws in Vietnam and furthermore could support clients with required procedures with the Vietnamese authorities.

 

Read More

Venue for Dispute Settlement by Arbitration in Vietnam

What is Venue for Dispute Settlement by Arbitration in Vietnam?

According to Article 11 of Vietnam Law on Commercial Arbitration, the venue for dispute settlement by arbitration in Vietnam is as agreed by parties or decided by arbitration council.  In particular:

 

 Arbitration Lawyers in Vietnam

The parties may reach agreement on venues for dispute settlement. If no agreement is made, the arbitration council shall decide on such venue. A venue for dispute settlement may be within or outside the Vietnamese territory.

Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitration council may hold a meeting at a venue regarded as appropriate for its members to exchange opinions, for taking witnesses’ statements, consulting experts or for assessing goods, assets or other documents.

ANT Lawyers - a law firm in Vietnam our trial lawyers with accreditation in national and international arbitration practice could help providing legal advice in disputed matters, and guide the clients through out the process. The arbitration lawyers in Vietnam at ANT Lawyers could also advise the clients on various matters from choice of arbitrator, choice of arbitration rules, ad-hoc or institutional arbitration, place of arbitration, enforcement of arbitral award.

 

Read More

Forms of Disputes and Approaches to Settlement in Vietnam

Dispute in Vietnam could be between parties in business transaction, foreign investors and Vietnam government, or between countries in implementing international treaties.

 

   Forms of Disputes and Approaches to Settlement in Vietnam

The formation of market economy in Vietnam took place in the context of the development in the width and depth of the economic ties at a significant fast pace that make Vietnam an important part of the world supply chain. Vietnam suppliers could sell the goods and services to the world and the foreign supplier could also export their goods and services to Vietnam market. Further, as the Vietnam market opens up, foreign investors could invest through various forms of investments in Vietnam i.e. acquire equities in Vietnam companies, establish business in Vietnam. During this process, disputes are an inevitable result which has been growing in scale and complexity.

Most should agree that disputes shall be construed as the dissent, inconsistencies or conflicts of interests, rights and obligations between the parties in the economic relations at different levels. Accordingly, economic disputes can have the following basic forms:

-Disputes in business are between the participants in a business transaction including investments, production to consumption of products or performance of services on the market for profit purposes i.e. professional and product liability, debt disputes over a business transaction, franchise disputes, intellectual property disputes, and disputes over contract for supply of goods or services…

-Disputes between foreign investors with Vietnam government agencies, arising in the implementation of the BTO, BT, BOT, and the implementation of international agreements on promotion and protection bilateral and multilateral investment i.e. government policy and policy measures, concession to water and sewerage, power or energy supply, project or contract payment…

-Disputes between countries in the implementation of the international bilateral and multilateral agreements.

In Vietnam, as the disputes arise, parties involved could consider resolving the matters through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or taking court actions after taking consideration of various factors including cost, time, and the complexity of the disputes. ANT Lawyers - law firm in Vietnam with skillful arbitration lawyers in Vietnam should be consulted to provide the suitable advice for dispute resolution.

 

Read More

Determination of Competence between Court and Arbitration in Vietnam

Dispute resolution is always a matter of concern in Vietnam when it comes to the regulations and the effective enforcement of government authority.

 

Arbitral Award Enforcement Law Firm in Vietnam

The Council of Judges of the Supreme People’s Court issued Resolution 01/2014/NQ-HDTP in order to provide guidelines for the Law on Commercial Arbitration in Vietnam on dispute resolution process.

Accordingly, the courts in Vietnam are permitted to deal with disputes which are agreed to be settled by arbitrators in the following cases:

i) There is a Decision of the court on cancelling Arbitration’s Judgement, Council of Arbitration’s Decision on recognition agreement of parties.

2) The parties have agreed to settle their disputes at a specific arbitration center but it has stopped operating;

3) The arbitrators selected by the parties cannot participate in solving disputes due to force majeure events;

4) The appointed arbitrator refuses to settle the dispute without an agreement on a replacement;

5) The proceedings rules selected by the parties are different from different from those of the selected arbitration center, and this center does not adopt rules of the other centers.

6) Consumers object to the arbitrator selection according to Articles 17 of the Law on Commercial Arbitration

In the first four cases, the parties must not reach an alternative agreement on replacement.

Arbitration lawyers in Vietnam at ANT Lawyers with accreditation in national and international arbitration practice could help providing legal advice in disputed matters, and guide the clients throughout the process. The arbitration lawyers in Vietnam could also advise the clients on various matters from choice of arbitrator, choice of arbitration rules, ad-hoc or institutional arbitration, place of arbitration, enforcement of arbitral award. For advice or services request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529.

 

Read More

Application of Administrative Measures to Protect Intellectual Property Rights in Vietnam

Since joining WTO, Vietnam has been coping to comply with the international commitments in general and intellectual property area in particular. In order to ensure fair legal environment and the benefits of intellectual property right holders, the Vietnam laws provide a number of ways in which holders can apply the following methods to protect their intellectual property rights in Vietnam:

 

Filing Lawsuit to protect intellectual property rights in Vietnam

Negotiation: requesting organizations, individuals committing infringement acts of intellectual property rights to terminate the infringing acts, apologize, publicly rectify and compensate damages;

Using administrative remedies: requesting the competent agencies to handle infringement acts of intellectual property rights;

Filing claim at court or arbitration center: initiating a lawsuit at a competent court or an arbitrator to protect their legitimate rights and interests;

Negotiation is often used in the first step to request the violator to stop the infringement of intellectual property rights. However, this measure is not potentially effective because it dependents on goodwill and cooperation of the violator as well as the legal basis, evidences that you can provide to demonstrate and warn of violating acts.

Relating to the dispute settlements, due to high costs, complicated procedures and extended time, this measure is not commonly selected as the best treatment.

In Vietnam, intellectual property infringement is mainly dealt with through administrative measures. Depending on their functions and responsibility, competent state management agencies deal with infringements of intellectual property rights as per request of the IP holders Currently, through the following agencies:

Inspectorate of the Ministry of Science and Technology;

Economic Police of the Ministry of Public Security and;

Market management of the Ministry of Industry and Trade.

In case of dealing with infringements of intellectual property rights in Vietnam, the holders should carry out the following steps:

1.Submission of a written request to terminate an infringement of intellectual property rights:

This step is optional to save costs for the infringed party as well as deal with the infringement on the basis of goodwill and cooperation. The infringed party should send documents, including a persuasive Cease and Desist letter and evidences, to the violator for the purpose of requesting them to terminate the violation and commit not to repeat the infringement in the future. In fact, many intellectual property right holders have reached their goals at this step providing that they can collect enough proof.

2.Requesting the competent state agencies to handle acts of infringement of intellectual property rights:

In this step, the infringed party must prove both its ownership to the intellectual property and information, evidence of the infringement by the infringing party.

The application of administrative remedies is effective handled, so it should be preferable to filling a lawsuit. After requesting the administrative agency to penalize the infringing party, the right holder still remain their right to initiate a lawsuit in court to claim of damages. Actually, the combination of administrative measures and lawsuits at court would be more effective for intellectual property right holders.

ANT Lawyers - a Law firm in Vietnam with a team of experienced lawyers, IP consultants and IP agent in Vietnam in the field of Intellectual Property will help customers implement procedures for registering intellectual property rights in Vietnam in the most effective way.

 

Read More

What is Value-added Tax Reduction Policy in 2022?

In order to stimulate growth and recover the economy after the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Government has issued a policy to reduce value added tax. The reduction of value-added tax is an effective solution and tool to stimulate consumption and is expected to create a driving force for rapid development to help businesses restore business and production.

 

The value-added tax reduction policy has been promulgated by Decree 15/2022/ND-CP stipulating the tax exemption and reduction policy according to the National Assembly’s Resolution No. 43/2022/QH15 on fiscal and monetary policies currency to support the program of socio-economic recovery and development. Accordingly, value added tax will be reduced from 10% to 8%. This reduction will create conditions for consumers to increase spending, through which businesses will sell more products.

The value-added tax reduction will be applied to groups of goods and services currently subject to the 10% tax rate, except for the following groups of goods and services: (i) Telecommunications, financial and banking activities commodities, securities, insurance, real estate trading, metals and prefabricated metal products, mining products (excluding coal mining), coke, refined petroleum, chemical products; (ii) Products, goods and services subject to excise tax; (iii) Information technology under the law on information technology. However, if the goods and services are not subject to value-added tax or subject to value-added tax of 5% according to the provisions of the Law on Value-Added Tax, the provisions of the Law on Value-Added Tax shall be applied and not entitled to value added tax reduction.

It is important to note the value-added tax calculation method to apply. Accordingly, if the enterprise calculates value-added tax by the deduction method, the value-added tax rate of 8% shall apply; and in case the enterprise calculates value-added tax according to the percentage method on sales, collected, it will be reduced by 20% of the percentage rate for calculating value-added tax when issuing invoices for goods and services eligible for value-added tax reduction as prescribed.

The value-added tax reduction will be implemented quickly and businesses and consumers will immediately benefit. This tax reduction is expected to help reduce the cost of products and services, thereby stimulating consumer demand. Besides, it will help increase production output of enterprises and create more jobs for workers. Therefore, the reduction of value added tax is considered necessary solutions to promote the economy to recover soon after a long time affected by the pandemic.

The value-added tax reduction policy will be effective from February 1^st, 2022 to the end of December 31^st, 2022. Previously, value-added tax was only reduced for a few specific products, but with this policy, the object of tax reduction has been expanded in most fields of business and production. Therefore, the impact of this policy on the economy in the future is very large. However, in order for the value-added tax reduction to reach consumers, tax authorities need stricter inspection and control to meet the set goals. When in doubt, it is important to consult with tax lawyers in Vietnam for solutions and advice.

ANT Lawyers is a Law firm in Vietnam with international standards, recognized by Legal500, IFLR1000. We are an exclusive Vietnam member of Prea Legal, the global law firm network covering more than 150 juridictions. The firm provides a range of legal services as following to multinational and domestic clients.

 

Read More